Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

how to block emf  (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.



However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In  https://fnote.me/notes/T1yh3w  of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For  Proteck'd Clothing , exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.